1) Body language.
Communicating non-verbally:
- bill please
- pint please
- 'what did you say?'
- he's a loser
- I'm bored
- they smell
Sin is our biggest enemy (not the particular ways we're tempted to sin). Original sin distorts us. Actual sin distracts us, and indwelling sin manipulates us. And by us I mean Christians. If we look at sin as merely making a mistake, then we just need a new iPhone app, and we don't need a saviour.Notes from: The Empty Self 'gnostic and Jungian Foundations of Modern Identity'
In keeping with his view that all aspects of human psychology were ultimately traceable to erotic frustrations of various kinds Freud tried to show that Leonardo's (da vinci) immense creativity arose out of an underlying homosexual conflict.However the answer to a lot of back and forth about the source and motive of Leonardo's greatness Jeffery Satinover notes:
In Leonardo we directly witness the only god there really is: human greatnessLeonardo was the very prototype of modern identify formation - identity rooted in personal grandeur
'There are many kinds of people and each type is governed by a different god. Each therefore has his own kind of sexuality, his own style of relationship, his own method of gaining fulfilment in work. You cannot judge a man, especially a gifted man, by the standards of one god; certainly not by the bourgeois, patriarchal standards of the so-called 'God of Israel.' Stop confronting us with the Holy One of Israel, for we are such men as will burst the bonds of all monotheistic tyranny. Leonardo and we, his many modern simulacra, are an elite, priests of Horus the falcon-god.'In this way the door was opened to a resurgence of pagan ways of assessing and valuing human behaviour. We are not all subject to the same law of God; there are a variety of different moralities to which we may be subject, depending on to which 'god' we belong.
...one must realise that true perfection is God's essence. every fault is merely the absence of his good and the concealment of his presence. The closeness of God and illumination of his presence is therefore the root and cause of every perfection that exists. The concealment of his presence, on the other hand, is the root and cause of every fault, the degree of deficiency depending on the degree of this concealment.Masculine and Feminine
As we have progressively abandoned the eternal, unseen Divine standard in favour of a sequence of transitory, visible, fallen ones, our capacity to discern good from evil, truth from lie, has diminished. In like fashion the discrimination between the true feminine and the true masculine has been lost. Human beings, as individuals or as groups, are inevitably a mixture of masculine and feminine qualities, as of good and evil ones. no one is purely masculine or feminine. But now we have lost the ability to distinguish these qualities and rightly value them. The result has been a widespread disordering of relations between men and women. And because the relationship between man and woman is the basis of the family, the destruction fo the family is progressing rapidly.The ancient Chinese understood this as well:
The Family shows the laws operative within the household that, transferred to outside life, keep the state and the world in order.The traditional family structure is associated with the lowest levels of psychopathology and with the highest levels of human happiness and accomplishment.
A society in which there is a large proportion of stable, traditional families - that is, with a mother who remains permanently married to a father both of whom are their children's first and only parents - will produce the highest percentage of relatively healthy individuals. the smaller the proportion of such families, the higher the rates of alcoholism and drug addiction, suicide, homosexuality, pornography, promiscuity and crime. Even physical health is profoundly affect by the presence or absence of stable family structure.Chapter 2: Gnosticism
Heresies perish not with their authors, but like the river Arethusa, though they lose their currents in one place, they rise again in another.
Sit Thomas Browne'Arethusa' is a (mythic) river said to start in Greece and dive under the sea to rise up again in Sicily.
As briefly noted above, the basic principles of Gnosticism is that 'salvation; is achievable through one's own mental activity (often thought of today as higher imagination; recall Blake's comments above). Gnosticism makes a subtler, more mystical, appeal than either 'faith' or 'works'; that ultimate value is itself a mental state, and that mind is capable, on its own, of achieving it ('only eat this... and you shall know...').The reconciliation of Good and Evil:
In the Judaeo-Christian worldview, creation exists primarily as a field in which man lives out a struggle to make good manifest against its absence, in spite of his final inability to do so on his own.Gnosticism begins in ascetic intellectualism. Within a few generations its followers degenerate into licence, since the instincts can never be constrained by mere intellect, let alone by falsehood. Instinctive gratification soon becomes identified with spiritual progress, the whole process of degradation being dressed-up in lofty-sounding rhetoric. when, after the French revolution, the goddess Reason was enthroned in Paris (at Our Lady), it was a prostitue who was paraded through the streets to be crowned.
It is their tangible reality that inspires faith; their symbolic reality that engenders meaning.Shocking quote at a 'Re-imagining conference' a prof at Union Theological Seminary said:
I don't think we need a theory of atonement at all. I don't think we need folks hanging on crosses and blood dripping and weird stuff.Jung openly considered depth psychology in general - and his in particular - to be a modern reawakening of Gnosticism which he actively promoted as superior to Christianity.
It is polytheism that stands behind the mantras of 'diversity', 'tolerance' and 'inclusivity' now being so widely misused. the modern, psychologised manifestation of polytheism is the plausible idea that since people differ, there must be different standards of behaviour - hence of morality - to apply to each type of person. In polytheism there is no absolute overarching standard toward which all people need aspire. For each type of person, there is a god among the many gods. There is a god for the tribe of women (who is herself a goddess), there is a god for the tribe of warriors (who is himself warlike), there is a god for the tribe of homosexuals (who is himself pansexual), as though we are not all under one God and obliged to one law.Psychology, Polytheism and the Worship of Instinct
Pagans make and worship idols that are mere representations of their own impulses - 'gods that are no gods' - gods of power, money, fame, violence, sexuality. In primitive societies, these idols are of wood and silver and stone; in civilised ones they are of words and concepts - an insignificance difference. In paganism, people worship at different altars because each has a different dominating instinct.A morality which attempts to derive itself purely from psyche, with reference to nothing beyond, will end up being either overtly amoral (as with reductionistic psychologies deriving from Freud), or polytheistic (as are those spiritualistic psychologies that derive from Jung).
Let us examine what followes from Jung's scientific-sounding proposition that 'aciviated archetypes generate parapsychological events ' When an instinct is activated - aggression, r sexuality, or hunger, or the drive for nurturance and so on - one of the basic animal cravings is aroused and we find ourselves driven in accord with its dictates. Associated with the subjective sense of craving (or desire or intent) is a measurable physiological arousal. The 'parapsychological phenomena' somewhat more common in this state of instinctive/archetypal arousal encompass the supernatural moving of objects at a distance without physical force ('telekinesis', and example is Jung's 'catalytic exteriorisation phenomenon') and the supernatural transfer of information ('telepathy', 'precognition'). typically, these evetns occur in fragmentary, unreliable, fashion.
As with 'syncronicity', the terms 'parapsychology', 'telepathy' and 'telekenisis' are but neologisms that relabel a class of events for which there exists no scientific explanation. Parapsychology research, such as it is, merely continues to demonstrate that its subject matter exists.
There is however an older explanation for such events. this older view holds that 'parapsychological' phenomena are not entirely psychological, but at least in part spiritual. The events are ahrd to understand because the spirit(s) stage-managing them are deliberately deceptive - duplicitous - to boot. Of course, this older formulation attributes to the 'managers' of these events deliberation and intentionality and a certain maliciousness, that is, personality.Continued:
Let us restate it without the scientisms. There exist invisible, incorporeal being-like entities with a semi-independent consciousness. Each has its own intentions, attitudes and feelings. Each can, it seems, 'possess' us and make us identify with what it wants. Such beings appear most readily when our instinctive cravings are activated. they seem able to provide us with information in a supernatural but most often in a frustratingly partial, hence useless, fashion. They are capable of moving objects around at a distance, often in a frightening, noisy, mischievous fashion just as if they take special pleasure in practical jokes.
If we de-sanitise the language and restore the orthodox biblical symbol-system, we recognise 'activated archetypes generating parapsychological events' as a description of demons. For that is precisely what demons have always been thought to be: beings with their own intentions, duplicitous, tricky and mercurial, attachable in some way to the hum mind, and appearing to feed upon unconstrained animal arousal; providing us with 'information', that is 'higher knowledge' which is a mixture of truth and falsehood.
'Always pray for breakthrough. Always prepare for the long haul.'
Two people from scripture. Abinadab and Obed-EdomThe principle runs through all life from top to bottom. Give up your self,
and you will find your real self. Lose your life and you will save it.
Submit to death, death of your ambitions and favourite wishes every day and death of your whole body in the end: submit with every fibre of your being, and you will find eternal life. Keep back nothing. Nothing that you have not given away will ever be really yours. Nothing in you that has not died will ever be raised from the dead. Look for yourself, and you will find in the long run only hatred, loneliness, despair, rage, ruin, and decay. But look for Christ and you will find Him, and with Him everything else thrown in.
Two little lines I heard one day,Traveling along life’s busy way;Bringing conviction to my heart,And from my mind would not depart;Only one life, twill soon be past,Only what’s done for Christ will last.
Best of all is a letter from a British soldier to his sister, written on Christmas Day 1914 in a trench on the Western Front, describing the truce that broke out after German troops ventured into no man’s land to bury their dead:
These are not the savage barbarians we’ve read so much about. They are men with homes and families, hopes and fears, principles and, yes, love of country. In other words, men like ourselves. Why are we led to believe otherwise? All nations say they want peace. Yet on this Christmas morning, I wonder if we want it quite enough.
However, I mean something more than this. I mean that human achievements are always and everywhere collective. Every object and service you use is the product of different minds working together to invent or manage something that is way beyond the capacity of any individual mind. This is why central planning does not work. Ten million people eat lunch in London most days; how the heck they get what they want and when and where, given that a lot of them decide at the last minute, is baffling. Were there a London lunch commissioner to organise it, he would fail badly. Individual decisions integrated by price signals work, and work very well indeed.
And here is the key insight from evolution. Our brains grew big long, long before we achieved civilisation. We’ve had 1,200cc of intelligence for half a million years: even Neanderthals had huge brains. For 99 per cent of that time we were just another hard-pressed species, as bottle-nosed dolphins are today, and around 75,000 years ago we teeter-ed on the brink of extinction.
What changed was not some bright spark of a new gene being turned on, but that we began to exchange and specialise, to create collective intelligence, rather than rely on individual braininess. To put it another way, dozens of stupid people in a room who talk to each other will achieve far more than an equal number of clever people who don’t. The internet only underlines this point. Human intelligence is a distributed, collaborative phenomenon