Monday, 12 March 2018

Identity notes and research

Identity: 

Carl Truman: our cosmetic surgery or gender reassignment surgery displays bids 'for the total sovereignty of the individual with regard to personal identity.' We feel we ought to be able to choose who we are rather than being told who we are.

On identity linked to sexuality Rosaria Butterfield (Po-mo professor at uni and LGBT activist until she got saved) makes a good point: 
Sin is our biggest enemy (not the particular ways we're tempted to sin). Original sin distorts us. Actual sin distracts us, and indwelling sin manipulates us. And by us I mean Christians. If we look at sin as merely making a mistake, then we just need a new iPhone app, and we don't need a saviour. 
Notes from: The Empty Self 'gnostic and Jungian Foundations of Modern Identity'
In keeping with his view that all aspects of human psychology were ultimately traceable to erotic frustrations of various kinds Freud tried to show that Leonardo's (da vinci) immense creativity arose out of an underlying homosexual conflict.
However the answer to a lot of back and forth about the source and motive of Leonardo's greatness Jeffery Satinover notes:
In Leonardo we directly witness the only god there really is: human greatness 
Leonardo was the very prototype of modern identify formation - identity rooted in personal grandeur

Paganism and polytheism:

In the 1800s, Shelly averred that 'Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind.'

James Hillman agreed and justified this Jungian restructuring of modern identity saying in effect:
'There are many kinds of people and each type is governed by a different god. Each therefore has his own kind of sexuality, his own style of relationship, his own method of gaining fulfilment in work. You cannot judge a man, especially a gifted man, by the standards of one god; certainly not by the bourgeois, patriarchal standards of the so-called 'God of Israel.' Stop confronting us with the Holy One of Israel, for we are such men as will burst the bonds of all monotheistic tyranny. Leonardo and we, his many modern simulacra, are an elite, priests of Horus the falcon-god.'
In this way the door was opened to a resurgence of pagan ways of assessing and valuing human behaviour. We are not all subject to the same law of God; there are a variety of different moralities to which we may be subject, depending on to which 'god' we belong.

We see the spread of this idea in a very subtle way:

As the Renaissance proceeded, the concern with personal greatness rapidly spread. In the Middle Ages, monks and masons could toil for generations on a single illuminated manuscript or a great cathedral, and no one would ever know of them. the individual author or artist was of no account - Soli Deo Gloria: to God alone belonged the glory.

But in the Renaissance all this changed. Authors and artists began to sign their works; the pride in personal greatness slowly began to displace the greatness and glory of God.

Modern selfhood is: God stripped out of our core that we might seek our identity in self-enthronement.

The resymbolisation of the Western Psyche:

There are other examples of resymbolisation. but this is the father of them all: the psychological transformation of God into self.

Resymbolisation in Jung.

As the Judaeo-Christian tradition has weakened, spiritually-starved people have progressively replaced the very specific symbol system of the Bible, upon which Western civilisation is founded, with various mostly Eastern and pagan imports.

Good & Evil

Eden and the Fall:

The Hebrew is better translated as 'deciding for yourselves what is good and what is evil.'

The displacement of God by self is therefore also the loss of a clear, revealed vision of good and evil. How can a mind ultimately driven by natural, selfish instincts possibly generated, on its own, a vision of perfect goodness?

Thus:

nature, that which simply is (the seen real) may point to but can never replace the revelation of what should be (the unseen real)...

...The vision of the holy is, as it were, the star that we cannot touch but which points the way. To follow this star is to stand firm in the knowledge that God is wholly good.

God's vision of the good is one wherein evil is nothing but God's absence, it is not his coequal. Hell is the total absence of God as heaven is his total presence; earthly hells are his relative absence as earthly heavens are his relative presence.

Rabbit Moshe Chaim Luzzato:
...one must realise that true perfection is God's essence. every fault is merely the absence of his good and the concealment of his presence. The closeness of God and illumination of his presence is therefore the root and cause of every perfection that exists. The concealment of his presence, on the other hand, is the root and cause of every fault, the degree of deficiency depending on the degree of this concealment.
Masculine and Feminine 
As we have progressively abandoned the eternal, unseen Divine standard in favour of a sequence of transitory, visible, fallen ones, our capacity to discern good from evil, truth from lie, has diminished. In like fashion the discrimination between the true feminine and the true masculine has been lost. Human beings, as individuals or as groups, are inevitably a mixture of masculine and feminine qualities, as of good and evil ones. no one is purely masculine or feminine. But now we have lost the ability to distinguish these qualities and rightly value them. The result has been a widespread disordering of relations between men and women. And because the relationship between man and woman is the basis of the family, the destruction fo the family is progressing rapidly.
The ancient Chinese understood this as well:
The Family shows the laws operative within the household that, transferred to outside life, keep the state and the world in order.
The traditional family structure is associated with the lowest levels of psychopathology and with the highest levels of human happiness and accomplishment.
A society in which there is a large proportion of stable, traditional families - that is, with a mother who remains permanently married to a father both of whom are their children's first and only parents - will produce the highest percentage of relatively healthy individuals. the smaller the proportion of such families, the higher the rates of alcoholism and drug addiction, suicide, homosexuality, pornography, promiscuity and crime. Even physical health is profoundly affect by the presence or absence of stable family structure. 
Chapter 2: Gnosticism 

Here's a good quote that could be applied to many things:
Heresies perish not with their authors, but like the river Arethusa, though they lose their currents in one place, they rise again in another.
Sit Thomas Browne 
'Arethusa' is a (mythic) river said to start in Greece and dive under the sea to rise up again in Sicily.

Gnosticism. Gnostic thought lies in its claim that salvation may be attained through secret knowledge available only to an initiated elite.

Our word devil is cognate to the German zweifel, meaning doubt, literally 'two-cased'

Gnostic 'Salvation':
As briefly noted above, the basic principles of Gnosticism is that 'salvation; is achievable through one's own mental activity (often thought of today as higher imagination; recall Blake's comments above). Gnosticism makes a subtler, more mystical, appeal than either 'faith' or 'works'; that ultimate value is itself a mental state, and that mind is capable, on its own, of achieving it ('only eat this... and you shall know...').
 The reconciliation of Good and Evil:
In the Judaeo-Christian worldview, creation exists primarily as a field in which man lives out a struggle to make good manifest against its absence, in spite of his final inability to do so on his own.
Gnosticism begins in ascetic intellectualism. Within a few generations its followers degenerate into licence, since the instincts can never be constrained by mere intellect, let alone by falsehood. Instinctive gratification soon becomes identified with spiritual progress, the whole process of degradation being dressed-up in lofty-sounding rhetoric. when, after the French revolution, the goddess Reason was enthroned in Paris (at Our Lady), it was a prostitue who was paraded through the streets to be crowned.

On the Bible's stories and against a purely 'psychological' reading:
It is their tangible reality that inspires faith; their symbolic reality that engenders meaning.
Shocking quote at a 'Re-imagining conference' a prof at Union Theological Seminary said:
I don't think we need a theory of atonement at all. I don't think we need folks hanging on crosses and blood dripping and weird stuff.
 Jung openly considered depth psychology in general - and his in particular - to be a modern reawakening of Gnosticism which he actively promoted as superior to Christianity.

Paganism and polytheism:
It is polytheism that stands behind the mantras of 'diversity', 'tolerance' and 'inclusivity' now being so widely misused. the modern, psychologised manifestation of polytheism is the plausible idea that since people differ, there must be different standards of behaviour - hence of morality - to apply to each type of person. In polytheism there is no absolute overarching standard toward which all people need aspire. For each type of person, there is a god among the many gods. There is a god for the tribe of women (who is herself a goddess), there is a god for the tribe of warriors (who is himself warlike), there is a god for the tribe of homosexuals (who is himself pansexual), as though we are not all under one God and obliged to one law.
Psychology, Polytheism and the Worship of Instinct

In polytheism, ancient or modern, each group has its own god.

The pagan pschyotheology that  lurks behind Jungianism, and that has spread so widely within the church, is simply the psychologised worship of instinct.
Pagans make and worship idols that are mere representations of their own impulses - 'gods that are no gods' - gods of power, money, fame, violence, sexuality. In primitive societies, these idols are of wood and silver and stone; in civilised ones they are of words and concepts - an insignificance difference. In paganism, people worship at different altars because each has a different dominating instinct.
A morality which attempts to derive itself purely from psyche, with reference to nothing beyond, will end up being either overtly amoral (as with reductionistic psychologies deriving from Freud), or polytheistic (as are those spiritualistic psychologies that derive from Jung).

Occult and secret-knowledge practices: divination, astrology and 'sorcery'. Originally the drugs used in their practice was to produce a heightened state of 'consciousness'.

Chapter 3: The effect on public morals

An excellent chapter on the psychology of demons, well worth reading again!

The demonic

In his doctoral thesis concerning his cousin, the medium, Jung claimed that the spirit personality which possessed her was actually a dissociated part of herself - indeed, a superior aspect of her personality of which she consciously unaware and which she never accepted as herself.

Jung started by defining 'complexes' as normal sub-personalities within the human psyche. He continued by pointing out how an archetype forms the nucleus, as it were, of every complex. Since each archetype is merely the 'image' (representation in consciousness) of its underlying instince, this is to say that every complex develops around an instinct. The instincts are inherited; the complexes 'flesh out' the instinct with actual experience.

Jung's archetypes are what the ancients referred to as 'gods'.

KEY:
Let us examine what followes from Jung's scientific-sounding proposition that 'aciviated archetypes generate parapsychological events ' When an instinct is activated - aggression, r sexuality, or hunger, or the drive for nurturance and so on - one of the basic animal cravings is aroused and we find ourselves driven in accord with its dictates. Associated with the subjective sense of craving (or desire or intent) is a measurable physiological arousal. The 'parapsychological phenomena' somewhat more common in this state of instinctive/archetypal arousal encompass the supernatural moving of objects at a distance without physical force ('telekinesis', and example is Jung's 'catalytic exteriorisation phenomenon') and the supernatural transfer of information ('telepathy', 'precognition'). typically, these evetns occur in fragmentary, unreliable, fashion. 
As with 'syncronicity', the terms 'parapsychology', 'telepathy' and 'telekenisis' are but neologisms that relabel a class of events for which there exists no scientific explanation. Parapsychology research, such as it is, merely continues to demonstrate that its subject matter exists. 
There is however an older explanation for such events. this older view holds that 'parapsychological' phenomena are not entirely psychological, but at least in part spiritual. The events are ahrd to understand because the spirit(s) stage-managing them are deliberately deceptive - duplicitous - to boot. Of course, this older formulation attributes to the 'managers' of these events deliberation and intentionality and a certain maliciousness, that is, personality. 
Continued:
Let us restate it without the scientisms. There exist invisible, incorporeal being-like entities with a semi-independent consciousness. Each has its own intentions, attitudes and feelings. Each can, it seems, 'possess' us and make us identify with what it wants. Such beings appear most readily when our instinctive cravings are activated. they seem able to provide us with information in a supernatural but most often in a frustratingly partial, hence useless, fashion. They are capable of moving objects around at a distance, often in a frightening, noisy, mischievous fashion just as if they take special pleasure in practical jokes. 
If we de-sanitise the language and restore the orthodox biblical symbol-system, we recognise 'activated archetypes generating parapsychological events' as a description of demons. For that is precisely what demons have always been thought to be: beings with their own intentions, duplicitous, tricky and mercurial, attachable in some way to the hum mind, and appearing to feed upon unconstrained animal arousal; providing us with 'information', that is 'higher knowledge' which is a mixture of truth and falsehood.




Monday, 29 January 2018

Making Sense of God - Tim Keller

Quotes and comments.

Chapter 4: A Satisfaction that is not based on circumstances

Ecclesiastes 2:24 ‘A person can do nothing better than to find satisfaction in their own toil...’ but that is exactly what eludes him. He describes a life of accomplishment that very few achieve. Eccl. 2:4,8,10

Nevertheless he says: ‘I hated life... my heart began to despair over all my toilsome labour under the sun.’ Eccl. 2:17,20 

Nothing brings satisfaction: This is an abiding human problem and there is plenty of empirical research that backs it up. Studies find a very weak correlation between wealth and contentment, and the more prosperous. Society grows, the more common is depression. (Quoted from Haidt)

The things that human beings think will bring fulfilment and contentment don’t. Two approaches to happiness then exist. What Haidt calls the ‘early happiness hypothesis of ancient times.’ The principle being: we are unhappy even in success because we seek happiness from success. Buddha and the Chinese sage sand the Greek philosophers in the west saw that wealth, power, achievement, family, security etc. Can lead to only momentary happiness, which fades when taken away leaving you more empty than if you had never never tasted the joy. The answer, they said, was to not seek to change the world but rather to change your attitude toward the world. Epictetus: ‘do not seek to have events happen as you want them to, but instead want them to happen as they do happen and your life will go well.’ 

In short: don’t try to fulfil your desires, rather control and manage them.

However, modern research has shown that some external circumstances do correlate with increased satisfaction. In particular love relationships are important and therefore the advice of emotional detachment may actually undermine happiness. 

Haidt describes the ‘modern happiness hypothesis’ as being: whilst warngin against overdoing it, modern culture encourages its members to find satisfaction through active efforts to change our lives, not just accept life as it is. 

Keller adds: despite huge social, moral and technological advances ‘no one is arguing that we are significantly happier than our ancestors were.’ 

Some respond: it doesn’t matter, just carry on without worrying about happiness. Others that according to research we are in fact happier than we used to be. Still others acknowledge that ‘happiness’ is the wrong word and that when asked ‘how are you?’ Most people say ‘I’m fine,’ but the statistics on suicide and depression reveals this may not in fact be the case.

More accurate a gauge than ‘happiness’ we should ask about joy, fulfilment and satisfaction in life. 

Our levels of lasting contentment, Keller argues, are actually quite thin. Peggy Lee recorded a song in 1969 that sums up how we often feel: As a 12yr old she was taken to see a circus performance called ‘the greatest show on earth.’ But as she watched she ‘had the feeling that something was missing. I don’t know what, but when it was over I said to myself, ‘Is that all there is to a circus.’ Then she fell in love with a boy who later left her and she thought she’d die. “But I didn’t and when I didn’t I said to myself ‘Is that all there is to love?’ At every turn everything that should have delighted and satisfied her did not - nothing was big enough to fill her expectations or desires. There was always something missing, though she never knew what it was. 

Cynthia Hemel a columnist who saw friends go from anonymity to Hollywood stardom saw them discover to their horror that they were no more happy or fulfilled than before. Young people might say ‘It’d be different for me.’ No it wont:

 That’s what the wisdom of the ancients and all the anecdotal evidence in the world will tell you. 

The two main approaches: Satisfaction (‘it’) is still out there (to come or be sought) vs satisfaction (‘it’) isn’t possible.

It is out there: 
The young: ‘it is out there’ We get busy preparing ourselves to be happy. 
The resentful: We blame the things that stop us getting ‘it’
The driven: Constant reinvention assuring ourselves that ‘it’ is at the next level.
The despairing: we can never get it.

Francis Spufford: (we’re to blame so we hate ourselves)

But the day comes when you’re lying in the bath and you notice you are thirty-nine and that the way you’re living bears scarcely any resemblance to what you thought you always wanted, and yet, you realise you got there by a long series of choices.

It doesn’t exist:
Altruism then: helping others is the only right path for finding any personal contentment (although this uses the needy to selfishly serve self)
Cynicism: Stop chasing rainbows, stop crying after the moon. Lower your expectations. This makes you condescending toward anyone not as sophisticated or ironic as you, worse it ‘dehumanises you’ Martin Heidegger: what makes us human and not animal is a desire for joy, meaning and fulfilment. 
Detachment: Epictetus: ‘what harm is there while you are kissing your child to murmur softly, ‘Tomorrow you will die?’ However modern research supports intuition that diminishing your love others does not increase satisfaction. 

Some say this desire for happiness comes from an evolutionary trait carried forward. 

Augustine read Cicero who said: every person sets out to be happy but the majority are thoroughly wretched. He then concluded that the extreme scarcity of human contentment might be a judgment of divine providence for our sins. 

Augustine saw that it was actually product of our ‘displaced loves’:

We are most fundamentally shaped most by what we believe or think but by what we love. For when we ask whether somebody is a good person we are not asking what he believes or hopes for, but what he loves.

A virtue is nothing more than what we love: Courage is loving your neighbour’s well-being more than your own safety. Honesty is loving your neighbour’s interested more than your own, even when the truth will put you at a disadvantage. 
- What you love most at the moment is what controls your action at that moment. 

Our loves also have an order to them. A just and good person: is also a person who had rightly ordered his love, so that he does not love what it is wrong to love, or fail to love what should be loved, or love too much what should be loved less (or love too little what should be loved more). 

The reason even the best possible worldly goods will not satisfy is because we were created for a degree of delight and fulfilment that they cannot produce. 

...Even  goods on this scale cannot fill the vacuum. The cavern in our soul is indeed infinitely deep.

Tuesday, 9 January 2018

Graham & Belinda - Mental Health

Mental Health:

A state of well-being in which every individual realises his of her own potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully and is able to make a positive contribution to their community.

2014:

  • Estimated that, 27% of the adult pop. has experienced at leas one mental health disorder in the last year. 
  • That's 83 million people, with 21m suffering a major depression 
  • With only 50% of people receiving professional help.
Around 90% of suicide victims suffer from a psychiatric disorder. 

Among teenagers rates of anxiety and depression have increased by 70% in the past 25yrs.

26% of young people in UK experience suicidal thoughts.

How do we stop ourselves becoming or feeling overwhelmed when we help people?

- Boundaries: Set up boundaries around your home and family.
- Accountability: You always need someone to speak into your life and situation.
- Team: Be in team at all times.
- Expectations: It's not our responsibility to heal and set people free. We pray.
'Always pray for breakthrough. Always prepare for the long haul.'



Monday, 8 January 2018

Steve Oliver - Center Parcs

Story:
Japeelo
feeling called ot bring hope to Africa, to the daisy's of Africa. Felt God speak to him about preaching the gospel to Japeelo. Not being used to this, he was scared, but felt God had called him so he went.
The man was dressed in a blanket and hat, sitting at the edge of the his appartment.
Apartheid had just come to an end.
How are you?
Not good, I am scared. I have a pain in my heart and feel scared since I think I am going to die and I'm not sure what will happen to me.
Steve: [God obviously knows he needed to make it easy for me!] told him about Jesus.
Man replied: but I have been told that Jesus is the God of the white man only.
He then led Japeelo to the Lord, went home and told Heather.
Japeelo led his wife to the Lord.
After a year away Steve returned and Japeelo was waiting for him and said 'come on, they are waiting for you!' his whole family, village and extended family were there. Steve told them about Jesus and led many to the Lord.

Gave up his house and life in Cape Town (businessman with all the toys/car/house) and moved to the country (only house within a mile), and planted a church among the poorest of the poor.Started a church in Clarins, felt God say 'prepare for 500 people for Sunday,' no marketing no plan, bought enough food for 500 people. First baptism in the church 94 people got baptised!  that grew and led to seven other church plants. The region later changed it's name (to Dihlabeng) after apartheid to the name of the church since it had been such a blessing to the area and made such an impact.

They were looking after 350 hiv aids sufferers at any one time. Transformed the health care and education system. The church's influence was dramatic all because Jesus isn't the god of the white man only.

Then on to Dubai.

- Jesus is the saviour of the nations. 

Position yourself for the purposes of God

CS Lewis, keep nothing back...
The principle runs through all life from top to bottom. Give up your self,
and you will find your real self. Lose your life and you will save it.
Submit to death, death of your ambitions and favourite wishes every day and death of your whole body in the end: submit with every fibre of your being, and you will find eternal life. Keep back nothing. Nothing that you have not given away will ever be really yours. Nothing in you that has not died will ever be raised from the dead. Look for yourself, and you will find in the long run only hatred, loneliness, despair, rage, ruin, and decay. But look for Christ and you will find Him, and with Him everything else thrown in.
Two people from scripture. Abinadab and Obed-Edom
2 Samuel 5. Dagon vs Yahweh. 6 the Ark gets sent back to the Israelites. 7 The men of Kerith Jarim bring the Ark to the house of Abinadab.

- You cannot put God alongside the other gods in your life.

If you want to put God into your life you must get rid of the other gods in your life.

He is Lord and saviour. Come under is rule and reign.
Ease of life is our biggest threat in this nation. What we have is not the norm. We are part of about 2.5% of the world's population.

If we are going to see the gospel take effect in this nation and across the world we are going to need to see a generation of young people live sacrificially.

When pressures come the temptation is to erect more 'dagon' gods in our lives. Let them die.

Abinadab: leaves the Ark alone and is relived when it goes, one of his sons (Uzzah) gets killed as the Ark leaves.
Obed-edom:

Steve's comments as a South African church planter of the UK church:
- Ease. Love of and pursuit of an easy life.
- Refusal to take risks. Obsession with planning everything.
- Lack of expectation.
-

2 Samuel 6. Abinadab had the Ark for twenty years and nothing. Obed-Edom has it for a few months and experiences great blessing.

CT. Studd. Cambridge graduate. Inherited an estate/home house of equiv. £52m. Gave his £52m away, gave his life to the mission field. 
Two little lines I heard one day,Traveling along life’s busy way;Bringing conviction to my heart,And from my mind would not depart;Only one life, twill soon be past,Only what’s done for Christ will last.

Thursday, 28 December 2017

SPECTATOR: Christmas



Best of all is a letter from a British soldier to his sister, written on Christmas Day 1914 in a trench on the Western Front, describing the truce that broke out after German troops ventured into no man’s land to bury their dead:

These are not the savage barbarians we’ve read so much about. They are men with homes and families, hopes and fears, principles and, yes, love of country. In other words, men like ourselves. Why are we led to believe otherwise? All nations say they want peace. Yet on this Christmas morning, I wonder if we want it quite enough.

SPECTATOR: collect intelligence trumps individual intelligence

However, I mean something more than this. I mean that human achievements are always and everywhere collective. Every object and service you use is the product of different minds working together to invent or manage something that is way beyond the capacity of any individual mind. This is why central planning does not work. Ten million people eat lunch in London most days; how the heck they get what they want and when and where, given that a lot of them decide at the last minute, is baffling. Were there a London lunch commissioner to organise it, he would fail badly. Individual decisions integrated by price signals work, and work very well indeed.

And here is the key insight from evolution. Our brains grew big long, long before we achieved civilisation. We’ve had 1,200cc of intelligence for half a million years: even Neanderthals had huge brains. For 99 per cent of that time we were just another hard-pressed species, as bottle-nosed dolphins are today, and around 75,000 years ago we teeter-ed on the brink of extinction.

What changed was not some bright spark of a new gene being turned on, but that we began to exchange and specialise, to create collective intelligence, rather than rely on individual braininess. To put it another way, dozens of stupid people in a room who talk to each other will achieve far more than an equal number of clever people who don’t. The internet only underlines this point. Human intelligence is a distributed, collaborative phenomenon

Monday, 27 November 2017

Langon Gilkey - The Shantung Compound

Excerpts/quotes from Langdon Gilkey's Shantung Compound.

The moment freedom came:

The day, August 16 1945, was clear blue and warm, as such a day should have been. We all began our chores of cooking, stoking and cleaning up slops as usual. About the middle of the morning, however, word flashed around camp that an Allied plane had been sighted...
... the boy who spread the word... ran through the kitchen yard screaming in an almost insane excitement, "An American plane, and headed straight for us!"

We all flung our stirring paddles down beside the cauldrons, left the carrots unchopped on the tables, and tore after the boy to the ballfield. This miracle was true: there it was, now as big as a gull and heading for us from the western mountains. 
As it came steadily nearer, the elation of the assembled camp- 1500 strong - mounted. This meant that the Allies were probing into our area, not a slow thousand miles away! And people began to shout to themselves, to everyone around them, to the heavens above, their exhiliration:

"Why it's a big plane with four engines! It's coming straight for the camp - and look how low it is! Look, there's the American flag painted on the side! Why, it's almost touching the trees!... It's turning around again... It's coming back over the camp! ...Look, look, they're waving at us! They know who we are. They have come to get us!"

At this point the excitement was too great for any of us to contain. It surged up within us, a flood of joyful feeling, sweeping aside all our restraints and making us its captives. Suddenly I realised that for some seconds I had been running around in circles, waving my hands in the air and shouting at the top of my lungs. On becoming aware of these antics, I looked around briefly to see how others were behaving.

It was pandemonium, the more so because everyone like myself was looking up and shouting at the plane, and was unconscious of what he or anyone else was doing. Staid folk were embracing others to whom they had barely spoken for two years; proper middle-aged Englishmen and women were cheering or swearing. Others were laughing hysterically, or crying like babies. All were moved to an ecstasy of feeling that carried them quite out of their normal selves as the great plane banked over and circled the camp three times.

This plane was our plane. It was sent here for us, to tell us the war was over. It was the personal touch, the assurance that we were again included in the wider world of men-that our personal histories would resume - which gave those moments their supreme meaning and their violent emotion.

Then suddenly, all this sound stopped dead. A sharp gasp went up as fifteen hundred people stared in stark wonder. I could feel the drop of my own jaw. After flying very low back and forth about a mile from the camp, the plane's underside suddenly opened. Out of it, wonder of wonders, floated seven men in parachutes! This was the height of the incredible! Not only were they coming here some day, they were her today, in our midst! Rescue was here!


Fate:

Fate it thus the mask God's judgment in history wears to those who do not know him.

--

The fate that overtook the white residents of China was neither arbitrary nor blind. Rather, it represented the slow but certain unraveling of the consequences of the greed and intolerance which accompanied the imperialism of their forerunners. 

--

On meaning and fate for the unbeliever and believer:

For the man who knew nothing of divine Providence, coming to camp was an arbitrary fate that separated him from every familiar meaning by which he had lived his life. To those - and there were many - who found this new situation to be a strange work of Providence, however incomprehensible these purposes were, there could be no such loss of significance in the new and unexpected situation.

--

Our particular jobs of salesman, professor, or senator may prove useless in a camp or even in the next historical moment. But our neighbour is always with us, in the city, in the country, or in the camp. If the meaning of life on its deepest level is the service of God - which in turn means the service of the neighbour's needs and fellowship with him - then this is a task that carries over into any new situation.

--

On these two bases, therefore - the universal lordship of God and the universal presence of the neighbour with whom we can establish community - a significant vocation or task with religious roots cannot be removed by the ups and downs of historical fortune

--

One of the strangest lessons that our unstable life-passage teaches us is that the unwanted is often creative rather then destructive.

--

Only in God is there ultimate loyalty that does not breed injustice and cruelty, and a meaning from which nothing in heaven or on earth can separate us.